Northwest
boaters dodged a bullet in late June, but we should be aware that
our antagonists have vowed to reload and take aim again.
Imagine
starting every cruise by listening to the VHF radio to determine which
particular waters might be "open" to boating on a specific
day: "Boaters are advised that killer whales have been sighted
in President Channel. Recreational boating is forbidden in all waters
northwest of Orcas Island within a two-mile radius of Stuart, Waldron
and Sucia islands for a period of not less than ten hours, beginning
at 0800 today. This closure may be extended indefinitely. Additional
areas may be closed with ninety-minute notice. Boaters are reminded
that navigating in an Orca Zone is punishable by up to 90 days imprisonment,
confiscation of the offending vessel and up to a $50,000 fine. Boaters
are required to monitor this channel at all times."
Sound
far-fetched? Such a scenario wouldn't be completely inconceivable
if the environmental extremists should succeed in pressuring the government
to grant Endangered Species status to Northwest killer whales. The
orcas are currently protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act,
and reasonable rules have been created to assure that commercial and
recreational boaters have a minimal impact on the animals.
Endangered
Species designation allows ridiculously drastic actions to prevent
the extermination of a species. Most of us will remember the recent
debates about breaching the dams on the Columbia and Snake rivers
when various salmon runs were declared endangered. There was serious
discussion about tearing out the dams that generate most of the electricity
used in the area and enable irrigated agricultural productivity on
tens of thousands of acres of former desert. Nobody could be certain,
of course, that breaching the dams would actually benefit migrating
fish. If the Endangered Species Act could be used to blow up our regional
dams, politicians could surely be quick to enforce Draconian restrictions
on boating in a misguided effort to "save" the Orcas.
Most
boaters treasure the natural environment and the resident wildlife.
We should all be concerned for the long-term health of orcas, salmon,
seabirds, shellfish and other life forms that we encounter while enjoying
nature's bounty. Common sense dictates that we should avoid destroying
the glorious conditions we are so fortunate to enjoy.
Scientists
have reported a recent decrease in the killer whale population. Unfortunately,
we haven't intensively studied the orcas for enough decades to know
whether the population decrease is a normal, cyclical or biological
phenomenon. We do not know just what portion of the decrease is attributable
to the overharvesting of salmon, industrial and municipal pollution,
and other human factors. There isn't any way to know how many killer
whales lived in our regional waters 100, 200, or 300 years ago or
whether the current number is greater or lesser than the long-term
statistical average.
One
thing of which we can be certain is that our regional and national
politicians will use boaters as a scapegoat for far more than whatever
our fair share of the problem might actually be. There are certainly
more votes at stake from impassioned environmentalists than from recreational
boaters. Clamping down on boaters allows the politicians to appear
to be responding to a situation. It's much easier to put egregious
restrictions on summer cruising than to try to force local industries
to reduce water pollution or to ban the use of lawn fertilizers and
household garden insecticides.
Those
of us in the upper left corner of the country can learn from the experiences
of the lower right. Down Florida way, the endangered marine mammal
is the manatee, sometimes known as the "sea cow." A manatee
looks a bit like a miniature walrus or an extremely obese harbor seal.
The public probably considers them "cute." The manatee population
has been in steady decline, and every time one of the creatures turns
up dead with evident propeller damage, a clamor arises against propeller
driven boats. The official response has been predictable, with serious
restrictions on boating in "manatee zones" created in areas
where manatees are, have ever been, or just might migrate to in the
future. Manatees are territorial and aren't required to range far
afield in fertile, tropical waters to find adequate food.
With
a roaming, foraging, carnivorous species like the orcas, it becomes
incredibly complex to create a "no-boating" zone. Unpredictable
local closures are but one possible consequence, and while totally
unacceptable, such closures are still far from the worst imaginable
restrictions that could be forced upon us. The Marine Mammal Protection
Act stipulates that boats should not approach, chase or otherwise
harass orcas and other marine mammals. The act would provide more
than adequate protection if it were precisely observed.
The
environmental extremists have announced an intention to appeal the
ruling denying Endangered Species protection for orcas. Boaters need
to be aware that our behavior, as well as the level of the orca population,
is the subject of intense scrutiny. Each time some clueless dweeb
charges into the middle of a pod at 20 knots (leaving beer cans and
banana peels in the wake and hollering, "Get out that there Instamatic,
Mama! There's a bunch of whales or something out here!"), we
edge a little closer to a NW version of a manatee zone for killer
whales. We can be certain that the behavior of the ignorant few will
be spun as "typical" by the environmental extremists, while
the actions of that majority of boaters proceeding in a normal manner
and maintaining a respectful distance will be ignored. By voluntarily
minimizing our environmental impact, we can help assure that boaters
won't become an "endangered species." 